AI LAW RADAR · Daily Last verified 24 Jun 2026

Topic dossier

Deepfake & synthetic-media labelling laws

Where AI-generated images, video, audio and text must be disclosed, watermarked or removed — the binding rules and the proposals. 9 obligations across 7 jurisdictions — 7 in force. Next dated deadline: 2 Aug 2026.

A fast-moving cluster of laws now requires AI-generated and manipulated media to be labelled, watermarked or disclosed. They divide into two families: provenance rules that mark content at creation — a visible label plus embedded metadata or a watermark — and platform duties to take down non-consensual or deceptive synthetic media. The obligations below are the instruments AI Law Radar tracks under this theme, each linked to its primary source and dated to its last check.

The Register

9 obligations · 7 jurisdictions

European Union 1

EU Comprehensive

Article 50 transparency & deepfake labelling

Binds Providers & deployers of interactive, synthetic-content or biometric AI. Disclosure of AI interaction; marking of AI-generated content.

Stated maximum penalty — Up to 3% turnover or €15M

Applies 2 Aug 2026 checked 22 Jun 2026 EU AI Act ↗ high confidence

United States 2

US · Federal Binding

TAKE IT DOWN Act

Binds Anyone publishing non-consensual intimate imagery; covered online platforms (notice-and-removal). Bans non-consensual intimate imagery incl. AI deepfakes; covered platforms must remove within 48h (notice-and-removal duty live 19 May 2026).

Stated maximum penalty — FTC enforcement; criminal penalties

In force · 19 May 2025 checked 24 Jun 2026 TAKE IT DOWN Act (PL 119-12) ↗ high confidence
US · CA Binding

California AI Transparency Act (SB 942)

Binds Covered GenAI providers with >1M monthly users accessible in California. AI-detection tool + content provenance for >1M-user providers.

Stated maximum penalty — Civil penalties per violation/day

Applies 2 Aug 2026 checked 21 Jun 2026 SB 942 (amd. AB 853) ↗ high confidence

China 2

China Binding

Deep Synthesis Provisions

Binds Deep-synthesis service providers, technical supporters, and users. Conspicuous labelling and consent for synthetic media / deepfakes.

Stated maximum penalty — Rectification, suspension, criminal referral

In force · 10 Jan 2023 checked 24 Jun 2026 CAC Deep Synthesis Provisions ↗ high confidence
China Binding

AI-content labelling (+ GB 45438-2025)

Binds AI-content service & propagation platforms, app stores, and users. Explicit (visible) and implicit (metadata/watermark) labels on AI-generated content.

Stated maximum penalty — CAC administrative penalties

In force · 1 Sep 2025 checked 24 Jun 2026 CAC AI-Labelling Measures ↗ high confidence

South Korea 1

S. Korea Comprehensive

AI Basic Act — transparency & labelling

Binds AI business operators offering AI products/services in Korea (extraterritorial). Pre-notify users that a service uses AI; label generative and realistic synthetic outputs.

MSIT enforcement grace period through ~2026.

Stated maximum penalty — Admin fine up to ₩30M

In force · 22 Jan 2026 checked 24 Jun 2026 AI Basic Act ↗ high confidence

Vietnam 1

Vietnam Comprehensive

AI-content labelling & interaction disclosure

Binds Providers / deployers of generative AI and user-facing AI systems. Machine-readable labels on AI media; disclose when users interact with AI; deceptive deepfakes banned.

Stated maximum penalty — Admin fines (decree-set)

In force · 1 Mar 2026 checked 24 Jun 2026 Law 134/2025/QH15 ↗ medium confidence

India 1

India Binding

IT Rules — synthetic-content (deepfake) labelling

Binds Intermediaries, significant social-media intermediaries (5M+ users), GenAI tool providers. Permanent labels on AI-generated media + rapid takedown; significant-platform traceability.

Stated maximum penalty — Loss of safe harbour; IT Act offences

In force · 15 Nov 2025 checked 24 Jun 2026 IT Rules amendments (SGI) ↗ high confidence

Mexico 1

Mexico Binding

LFT/LFDA reform — AI use of performers

Binds Employers / producers using performers’ voice or image via AI; performer contracts. Prior written consent + remuneration to clone or simulate a performer’s voice or image.

Published in the DOF 14 May 2026; in force 15 May 2026.

Stated maximum penalty — Civil/authorial + labour liability

In force · 15 May 2026 checked 24 Jun 2026 LFT/LFDA reform (DOF 14 May 2026) ↗ high confidence

Questions & answers

From the data

Do AI-generated images and video have to be labelled?

It depends where the content is seen. The EU AI Act (Article 50), China’s labelling rules, South Korea’s AI Basic Act, Vietnam’s Law on AI and India’s IT Rules all require AI-generated or synthetic media to be disclosed or marked; the exact form — a visible label, embedded metadata, or a watermark — varies by instrument. Each row above links to the controlling text.

What does the EU AI Act say about deepfakes?

Article 50 requires providers and deployers to disclose AI interaction and to mark AI-generated or manipulated audio, image, video and text — including deepfakes — in a machine-readable way. Its transparency obligations are dated 2 August 2026.

Are deepfakes illegal?

Most jurisdictions do not ban synthetic media outright; they require it to be labelled and forbid specific harmful uses. Non-consensual intimate imagery is the clearest exception — the US TAKE IT DOWN Act and the EU’s new Article 5 prohibition target it directly.

Which jurisdictions does AI Law Radar track for deepfakes & content labelling?

We currently track deepfakes & content labelling obligations across 7 jurisdictions: European Union, United States, China, South Korea, Vietnam, India and Mexico. Each is dated and linked to its primary source on this page.